Start Finance Harald Seiz Karatbars International

Harald Seiz Karatbars International

0

We would like to compliment Harald Seiz, because not everyone who gave us reasons to report, then makes a wise choice in the selection of his lawyer. Harald Konstantin Seiz is completely different, according to Thomas Bremer from the internet portal www.diebewertung.de from Leipzig.

The law firm Höch we know from many proceedings before the LG Frankfurt, OLG Frankfurt, Hamburg Regional Court, OLG Hamburg and Berlin Regional Court. From this procedure of the company HEDERA Bauwert GmbH against our reporting.

Well, in press law we consider the law firm Höch already for one of the best in Germany, so we combine the inclusion of the law firm Höch in the discussion around the current discussion about the company Karatbars International and Harald Seiz, of course, with the desire for speedy education of the facts.

Ultimately, a mudslide as it is currently experienced can not be in the spirit of Harald Seiz and his investors, who are, of course, alarmed by the recent coverage in the media.

However, such discussions can then also shake up an entire industry in a sustainable manner, because, of course, potential customers who are referred to an investment in an ICO, then have such processes as in mind. Then take a distance from such investment offers.

Well, we had a press inquiry to Harald Konstantin Seiz in which we, Thomas Bremer of diebewertung.de from Leipzig, just wanted to hear his side to the allegations in the room. Of course, we wanted to give Harald Seiz the opportunity to calm down and to promote a factual clarification, which ultimately has to be in the interest of all concerned.

Now we have received a response from the law firm Höch on behalf of Harald Konstatin Seiz and his company Karatbars International. This answer is then but emphasized Attorney Höch in his mail to our editorial, intended only as background information and not intended for publication.

Well, we just say „chance missed“ to enter into a factual clarification and bring peace in the distribution, but we want to say even once, the answers we have received to our background information, have not convinced. For us, many questions remain open.

Well, Harald Seiz may then not only be „struggling“ with us, but possibly also with one or the other distribution head, because his sales force is currently unable to work in the tranquility needed to succeed as an entrepreneur can you imagine then already.

Harald Seiz should, this is our subjective opinion, finally clarify what’s right and what is wrong in the publications, so that the distribution and the investors know what they are.

Well, you can only shake your head, if you read the response of a Berlin law firm on our press request then so. Man Mr. Seiz, what should such unnecessary and nonsensical mails of a lawyer who does not know how sales works?

Not with me you have to have confidence, but with their investors and distributors, since such a-yes you have to say „stupid pointless mail“ to send, I would not have expected you then.
Otherwise, you are obviously so conversational when it comes to the presentation of your point of view on the Internet or the print media. The best example is probably the Netcoo article from the previous week. In hindsight, is the article possibly just „embarrassing?“

Well, that would not be impossible, because in the end, of course, this publication has launched research and reporting that would certainly not have come about without this report. That should probably be aware of them by now.

Now you obviously still useless to spend any money to write an e-mail whose information, the content of the mail has earned this term ?, not allowed to be used. Honestly, Mr. Seiz, from what kind of guide are they actually surrounded every day? Wise are those in my eyes now absolutely not.

Only you Mr. Seiz could end the whole discussion very quickly. Say what happened, and whether investors have to worry about their invested money. Stop the public debate with your service provider and have it checked by an independent auditor and IT specialist. One to which you can agree with your „opponent in this conflict“.

Nobody would appreciate it if you found out that everything is alright with you, what we should expect at the moment.